As an effect of course, but how far can you take it before it become tedious? What about writing an entire conversation without ever directly quoting anyone? It's not for the whole story, just this scene...
Quote:
That was wen Duvarre, the prince's valet, calmly put his head in the kitchen. he ignored the mess, the chaos, the protesting serving boys and the angry chef and coolly announced that the prince would have his dinner now. 
The chef bowed and laughed nervously. Food couldn't be prepared all at once, he said. The prince would have to be patient and wait for the proper dinner time. 
Oh no, Duvarre said. The prince wants his dinner now.
Well, you must convince him otherwise, the chef countered. For there is no dinner.
The Valet's eyes narrowed. The Chef smiled and pointed at his stove. 
Unless his highness prefers scorched pudding with no fish? He asked. 
Duvarre sniffed the mess and turned away with an expression of disgust. The Prince could not be served such a mess. 
Then what did the honorable lord Duvarre suggest? The chef wanted to know. 
Thoughts? Later, at the end of the conversation one of the page boys actually talks, like with quotations marks and all. But the chef never does, and Duvarre never does, in this scene. (Duvarre does later on.) I think it's because the whole tone of this scene is supposed to be distant; because the next scene is where the real action and plot is. But... I iz uncertain.  
