Cassandra wrote:
Perhaps it is important to note here that love (as it says in Romans 13) is the fulfilment of the law. I believe Romans is talking mostly about the law as laid out in Leviticus etc. just here, but Jesus confirmed that love also covers and fulfills the Ten Commandments.
I've for a long time understood the Ten Commandments to be, not just ten of the however-many-hundreds of laws in the capital-L-Law, but a summary of them (somewhat more practical than the one Jesus gives, that you quoted next) and the framework on which the Law hangs. (Which is why, after the Reformation, the German states replaced their civil law codes---which had been based around the framework of the seven cardinal or "deadly" sins---with new ones based on the framework of the Ten Commandments.)
Cassandra wrote:
'Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.' (Mtt. 22:37-40)
This makes sense in that it doesn't cancel the law, but makes it even greater. Take John 14 which says, 'If ye love me, keep my commandments'. Love is the fulfilling of the law in more senses than one. We see it in Christ's sacrifice. We see it in our love for Him and subseqent obedience. I guess its really a way of living.
Note that Jesus is quoting from two sections of the Mosaic Law there; this wasn't anything
new. What was revolutionary in his teaching was what these
meant: that yes, "with all your heart, soul, and mind" really means
all, and "love your neighbor as yourself" really means "as yourself" and "your neighbor" means more than "your countryman". In other words, that al these people who were so proud of themselves for keeping the Law in its minute details were actually frequently breaking it.
Cassandra wrote:
So I look at writing within this context... and consequently agree with previous posters.

No objection to writing on Sunday as I write worshiping, that He might be magnified in my body. Besides, as those before me have said, its a personal way of resting. Mum loves doing dishes for relaxation. Dad loves gardening for the same. I write.
Then, of course, as Airi pointed out, there a times its necessary to 'work' on Sundays. And if I had to I'd do my best to set aside another day (half-day, hours?) for rest. Sometimes, though, I expect this might not be possible.
Sometimes it's necessary to work on the Sabbath: emergencies arise (Jesus cites the ox-in-a-ditch case, and brings it home practically by healing a man), and in any case "the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath." But it seems to me (as it's been pointed out to me) that one of the purposes of the Sabbath in the Law was to teach us to trust God. For example, suppose it's harvest time, and the Sabbath, and it looks like it might rain tomorrow. Do I go out on the Sabbath to bring in the grain, or do I hope it doesn't rain and make the grain rot on the vine, and trust that God will provide for me and my family even if the harvest is ruined? (This is made even more clear by the requirement that they not even
plant for one year in seven, and one extra year beyond
that every half-century.)
Another thing is that the idea of "resting" on the Sabbath as meaning primarily "relaxation" is a comparatively modern notion. The Law says about the Sabbath (and other "holy days" it describes in similar terms), "do no
regular work" (emphasis mine). And so the Puritans, among others, had church services
all day except for meals, and the rest of the time was devoted to religious instruction within the family (for example, teaching the children the catechism).