Okay, I finally got around to watching the first LotR movie. (Yes, I got the extended editions.)
That was interesting. And long!
My overall opinion was that it really felt like the book on screen, as opposed to a new entity by itself. Some book-to-movie adaptations are practically different stories; the movie has a very unique feel. Some adaptations maintain the same overall tone, but the movie has a suitably cinematic feel – it’s paced and written like a movie.
This didn’t feel that way. Even though there were changes from the storyline, it still felt like the book. It was paced and written like the book. It didn’t have distinctly cinematic pacing. I think this is due in part to the fact that, like the book, this is only part of the tale. The book didn’t exactly have a complete arc or resolution of the plot, and the movie doesn’t either.
So, overall, I think the adaption does the book justice. Yes, there are changes out of necessity, but the writers did a good job of condensing the story without changing the essence. It’s especially amazing how they cut and shortened, particularly the first half, without disrupting the storyline.
There were only two changes they made to the book that I felt were dissatisfying. Having Arwen show up and race Frodo to Rivendell was a bit convenient, and I think it took the focus off of Frodo’s bravery. Also, having Strider and Merry/Pippin intentionally let Frodo go at the end (instead of him sneaking off) seemed a bit weird. Their motivations for doing so were a bit unclear, whereas in the novel it made perfect sense why Frodo snuck off.
Other than that, one can’t really complain about the quality of the movie. The special effects are seamless, and they didn’t do a lot of melodramatic time-remapping. Unlike *coughNarniacough*. The movie was gorgeous, but it was very dark in color. I realize that fits the tone of the book, but sometimes when there’s so many night scenes, it gets a bit monochromatic.
The characters were delightful. All very fitting to their personalities. A lot to love in that department. Interestingly, though, the characters I loved in the novel didn’t have the same appeal in the movie, but those I was indifferent about in the novel had more appeal in the movie. Legolas (did I spell that right?) is almost enough to make me appreciate Tolkien-style elves.

The violence is definitely a lot, but with the exception of a few images that really hit home, it wasn’t horrorific. They didn’t focus on a lot of blood or torture. So while it’s not for the squeamish, it really wasn’t the disgusting dark horror tale I’ve sometimes heard it made out to be.
A couple random thoughts… The elvish wood (I can’t remember how to spell it off the top of my head) was darker (in color) and more chaotic than I’d expected it to be. In the novel it was portrayed as paradise. Orcs weren’t quite what I expected, either… they’re not as big, and my, do they fall easily!
Well, those would be my thoughts. There really isn’t much to say, since it’s pretty similar to the book. If you like the book, you’d probably like the movies. If you didn’t like the book… I can’t imagine the movie doing much for you. Actually, I have a hard time seeing how someone could understand the movie without having read the book and knowing all the characters. It’s VERY complicated and VERY difficult to keep everyone straight on-screen.
*hopes that is a long enough review for Jonathan*
