Airianna Valenshia wrote:
I would like to clarify something though. I agree with Philli in that Aussie will be unable to refute line by line instances because she has not read the books. However, a person does not have to read a book in order to formulate thoughts on it.
You and Philly are both right. I wasn't planning on nit-picking technicalities and specific points in the series. I would only be acting on here-say and one sided reviews. I plan on directing the article at the entire picture of the series. The main storyline is the fact that it's about a young wizard who practises sorcery and is the good guy.
Evening, thankyou very much for your offer. I'd be honoured if you read over it for me. As someone who has read the series, you will know where I'm off, or if I get something wrong.
