Login | Register







Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Questions about the plausibility of steampunk weapons
PostPosted: June 12th, 2014, 9:39 am 
Writer
Writer
User avatar

Joined: November 20th, 2011, 11:12 am
Posts: 119
Location: A constant state of confusion...
So I'm currently writing a steampunkish space western about an assassin who works for a twisted futuristic version of the Roman Catholic Church, and I'm doing some weaponstorming.

My MC carries around a pair of Whisperers, long-barreled revolvers that are designed to fire silently. But instead of having to screw a silencer on, the silencing mechanism is built into the firearm itself.
My problem is that I have no idea how that would work. I'm not really a gadget guy, and not the best with moving parts. :roll: Does anybody out there have a notion of how I could do something like this?

The second thing is a grapple built into the character's mechanical arm. The grapple itself is shaped vaguely like a crucifix. It would be designed to fire from his wrist, lodge wherever he aimed it, and then let him reel himself up or rappel down. But again, I'm trying to figure out a feasible way to power and operate it.

Any thoughts?

_________________
My comedy channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/brokenlensprductions

Nephilim Rising, dystopian thriller
Status: Editing

Heirborn, fantasy steampunk
Status: FINISHED and fermenting

The Confessor, dystopian space western
Status: First Draft


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions about the plausibility of steampunk weapons
PostPosted: June 12th, 2014, 9:40 am 
Writer
Writer
User avatar

Joined: April 28th, 2013, 12:09 pm
Posts: 189
Location: A bunker under Greenwater Castle, Arizona
Concerning the revolvers, it's generally very difficult to achieve an appreciable amount of suppression with revolvers. This is due to the fact that the construction of the cylinder usually allows gasses (and thus, noise) to escape unchecked. Perhaps you could have the revolver cylinders operate more like a clip in a modern handgun, where... let's see... you have a circular cowling which encompasses the cylinder, one side of which flips up to allow you to put the cylinder in. The cowling is designed to absorb recoil and noise from the firing system. I think it's borderline infeasible, but hey, this is steampunk! XD


Grapples like that are always problematic, because you have to have A) a very strong miniaturized power source (to reel, launching could be done by a simple spring), B) a very strong miniaturized motor, and C) a cable strong enough to support the weight of a full-grown human. If you can do that with steampunk tech, more power to you.

_________________
Lo ilum on yis áne o duch e'tar.
May faith make your path clear.

I have a website now. Websites are cool. http://joelaparisi.com/
(Don't forget to subscribe to mah blog!)
I have a website for my series. Which is also cool. http://shraid.net


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions about the plausibility of steampunk weapons
PostPosted: June 12th, 2014, 9:40 am 
Writer
Writer
User avatar

Joined: November 20th, 2011, 11:12 am
Posts: 119
Location: A constant state of confusion...
I've had a lot more experience with semi auto handguns then revolvers, but I kinda figured the revolver thing would be tricky. The cowling is a good idea, though... Definitely something to chew on.

Thanks for the thoughts! That helps.

_________________
My comedy channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/brokenlensprductions

Nephilim Rising, dystopian thriller
Status: Editing

Heirborn, fantasy steampunk
Status: FINISHED and fermenting

The Confessor, dystopian space western
Status: First Draft


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions about the plausibility of steampunk weapons
PostPosted: June 12th, 2014, 9:41 am 
Grease Monkeys
Grease Monkeys
User avatar

Joined: June 18th, 2010, 10:37 pm
Posts: 5545
Location: Kentucky
No comment on the grapple but where the revolvers are concerned I think it's a really cool idea. The name is cool. Steampunk allows for a certain amount of fantastical feel to it, so while being realistic is always a good idea I would point out that most of your readers aren't going to wonder how they're silent, and the rest will probably assume it's a result of technology we don't posses yet. In other words, don't worry about the details too much, because it's your writing style that will carry it one way or another.

_________________
Floyd was frozen where he stood. He struggled to breathe, but the air smelled of blood and death and guilt. He tried to formulate a name, to ask, but language was meaningless, and words would not come. He tried to scream but the sound got stuck in his heart, shattered into a million pieces, and scattered to the wind.

In a world without superheroes, who will stand against the forces of evil?


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions about the plausibility of steampunk weapons
PostPosted: June 12th, 2014, 9:42 am 
Captain
Captain
User avatar

Joined: January 19th, 2011, 10:06 am
Posts: 3652
Location: Colorado, currently
Discord Username: Varon
Even with modern silencers, they're not silent. They just sound differently. So giving some new steampunk tech could definitely do whatever you want them to do.

_________________
I have not come to raise hell, but to bring your false Eden crashing down around your ears- Undecided project


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Questions about the plausibility of steampunk weapons
PostPosted: June 12th, 2014, 9:42 am 
Writer
Writer

Joined: November 21st, 2013, 8:13 pm
Posts: 3
The problem with the cylinder design is that, in order for it to efficiently rotate, there must be a gap between the back of the barrel and the front of the cylinder. That issue can actually be worked around, if you look up the Nagant M1895, it actually had an additional mechanism that pushed the cylinder forward to generate a seal with the barrel before firing. The advantage that it enjoyed was increased muzzle velocity, as the gasses that had not escaped propelled the round faster. It also made the Nagant M1895 one of the few revolvers that could be suppressed effectively.

As far as an integrated suppressor, that's relatively easy to develop. Look up the MP5-SD, the Wellrod, or the PB Silent Pistol for more information regarding those. Essentially, part of the barrel is replaced with baffles. It reduces the muzzle velocity of the weapon, but that's actually desirable for a suppressed weapon (if the bullet moves below the sound barrier, you lose the sonic boom).


Top
 Offline Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 6 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron