Okay here goes.
As far as emotions go, I used to be more externally emotional than most kids my age (at least that's my perception), and I hated that. So now I do not cry very often at all...it's been several (I wanna say maybe 5-6) years since I really cried, sobbing and stuff. I think that it is related to not wanting to show weakness, like others have said. I cannot remember what makes me really cry like that, or I can't identify it.

I also tear up and have to consciously compose myself when other people are crying around me, though I'm starting to get used to my mom doing it (it's sort of a regularity sometimes,

).
For example, my Great-Grandmother died a few years ago, I loved her, we went to her house and did stuff there, it was painful for me to have her die, but at the funeral I found that I wasn't crying like everyone else and I almost felt like a jerk for it. But my reasoning was this: She wasn't having a good life anymore (she was pretty muchly blind and in pain), she lived a full, happy (from what I hear) life, and she's a Christian so she's happier now than ever before...
So...yeah the only reason I teared up at that funeral was that everyone else was crying.

Of course, I wouldn't respond to that if my mom/dad died, or anyone like that.
So...yeah, I totally don't understand how or why I cry when I do...I think I don't like to remember.
Airi wrote:
A girl will come home and cry because someone was mean to her (this is an exaggerated example, cause I wouldn’t do that) whereas a guy would stew on the problem.
Jonathan wrote:
The two things most likely to make a man cry are: The loss or suffering of a loved one or other innocent person, or being worn down by a long struggle of some sort. Generally situations cause men to brood.
I think I'm like that, I stew on the problem. The times I cry are when the problem is making me totally despair and I fail to ignore it. I'm also usually alone at that time (otherwise I would ignore it).
Jonathan wrote:
Men are more likely to cry in the presence of women than of other men.
I think this is true for me as well. *hasn't had to cry in front of people except when he was little* Though I don't think I'd let that happen either unless I was totally broken.
Airi wrote:
This was because I was accustomed to the work and using those muscles, whereas they were not. They could still probably overtake me physically because guys are created more physically powerful than women.
I can testify to this concept, my Aunt that is 5 years older than me can probably still toss bales better than I (though my excuse is that her hands are more calloused, xD), while I could beat her in armwrestling (this didn't even happen until I was like 14 or so).
Airi wrote:
Also, they respond to environmental situations differently. Girls will spend their time talking about the scenery and describing it in great length. Guys are more prone to describe the objects that make up the scenery. They are wired to evaluate the situation and be prepared. So they enter situations with automatic difference and responses that aren’t necessarily even intentional. Think about it. When girls give directions they say things like: “You’ll have a McDonald’s on your right…you’ll pass over a bridge… there’s a little picket fence… a mailbox set off the road.” Guys are more likely to say “you drive __ far… turn right onto ___… it will be two streets up… go south…house number is___…”
I haven't noticed this (about scenery discussing) in particular, though it makes sense and it is probably accurate. I think I'd give directions the way you said a girl would (but that's because I almost never know streetnames...).
Airi wrote:
They also respond to situations very quickly. The Lord has designed guys' brains to run through a rapid fire thought process in an instant so that they can fly into action.
Jonathan wrote:
I'm not so sure about this one. I think it widely varies. Men are divided somewhat into leaders, thinkers, and followers. The leaders think things through fast and jump into action. The thinkers muse on a problem for awhile. The followers look to a leader for direction, though some will jump into action if there is no one to guide them.
I think...that I'm not quite like this. At least, I've never had to be. If someone was attacking, say, one of my cousins or someone (well, hopefully almost anyone), and I knew beyond doubt that they were attacking them, I don't think I'd think twice before going over and clocking them (supposing for the sake of argument that I'm able to). But in most situations I am pretty hesitant.
In response to Jonathan's response, I think this is a good grouping system, I think I might be a hybrid thinker and follower that could be a leader if he had to be.

Airi wrote:
When men meet other men, they look at the other guy and assess them, subconsciously. "Can I take him if I need to? If so, how?" I’ve found this is automatic.
Jonathan wrote:
All of it, including the "Can I take him?" part, is true. Men in general are dedicated to the idea of being a protector. They're always thinking of how to protect themselves and their loved ones in various situations and deal with various threats.
Yup.

Airi wrote:
To whine and moan is weakness. To overly show fear, is weakness. So guys tend to suppress these things.
I think this is how I treat most of my emotions, including happiness and excitement-though with happiness/excitement I don't exactly view that in the same way, I still hide it for (as far as I can tell) the same sort of reason. So this would go with crying, etc as well I think for me. Though...
Jonathan wrote:
Guys may whine and moan to sympathetic girls or other guys who are their friends, but only if they don't feel strength is needed in that moment, and they would never show the same vulnerability to their enemies.
I think I can relate here, I might "spill my guts" (which could include "whining" and "moaning", though not in that exact usage of those words, if that makes sense) to someone that would listen (and that seems to usually be a girl), but I'd never do that to an enemy or someone I didn't trust or someone I wanted to impress in a way.
Neil wrote:
Guys bond by being a part of something together. I became friends with a lot of people because we helped each other survive our first Speech tournament. Not much talking or playing...we were just with each other through the event.
I will note that lots of guys are conversationalists...but we bond by doing stuff together, not hearing about each others lives. We tend to not care so much about "knowing about a person" in terms of information.
Totally.
Jonathan wrote:
I feel inadequate to give a comprehensive overview of such a complex subject, even though I am a guy. However, I will answer questions as best I can, and maybe some other guys will offer to as well.
Me too, I think I could answer questions and try to help that way if there are any questions anymore...
I hope that this is somehow helpful.
