iarbonelseye010 wrote:
I disagree for two reasons. One, the fictitious element of our work gives us more freedom when working out the cosmology of our worlds than this. To treat speculative souls on the same level as the actual souls that actual rules are made for is a bit of a stretch. We have no way of knowing how God would handle the souls of our worlds were they real, and saying that the rules applied to our world would likewise be applied to any and all worlds seems like a bit of a hasty assumption.
There the rough: We don't know how he would treat souls in an other world, and so, in my opinion, we should not speculate. However, there are a few things we know for sure:
1. Heaven and Hell are the ultimate destinations of all souls other than God. You see, Heaven and Hell are the only eternal destinations, and souls are eternal. Not only this, but there can be no other destination even in an otherworld. Heaven is in actuality the only eternal place: Hell is simply the lack of all the Heaven is. They are the only and fully opposed eternal "locations" if you will.
2. All souls go to one or the other. Scripture supports this in that both angels and man will inhabit either one space or the other in the end. We can't speak of things beyond our experience, and so it is wise to not travel beyond our experience.
iarbonelseye010 wrote:
The Second reason, well it's more like an alternate perspective really, is that there is nothing that says we have to even address the issue of heaven or hell definitively when worldbuilding. Unless a story requires a portrayal of the afterlife (beyond the description of the inhabitants' beliefs on the matter), this is a subject that can be left unexplored if desired. But to say that all souls in all worlds are ultimately destined for either heaven or hell...I feel as if that puts an unnecessary limit on the rights of others to imagine otherwise.
We do have to explore it: After all, if there is no heaven and hell, to what end is service for the Lord? Christ's sacrifice would mean nothing if our souls were purified only to be destroyed. Why serve Him in any world if service ends in the same manner as dis-service? God doesn't ask us to do good for goodness sake, or he wouldn't be handing out rewards and punishments. Take away the consequences, and it would be better that we had never existed.
iarbonelseye010 wrote:
I'm not disagreeing with your theology, on the contrary I think it's very sound theology; but I do disagree with the idea that this logical understanding of reality must apply to fantasy, which is by definition not reality. Basically, I believe that a God-fearing, Bible-believing Christian can honor God in their writing/worldbuilding without saying that their characters ultimately go to either heaven or hell.
in Christ,
Jordan
Fantasy is firmly rooted in reality. Truly, fantasy is simply the "what if." "What if" the world was this way, in stead of the way it is now? That is fantasy. Fantasy is not an unreality because an unreality is a "nothing." A Fantasy is simply an 
alternate reality, and should only alternate from ours on points we are given freedom to speculate about. Heaven and Hell are spiritual absolutes, and therefore override and are over all realities, real or imagined.
Again, remember that you character have no reason to serve Him if they will receive no reward except to become nothing: There must be an afterlife in any Fantasy, and it must be Heaven and Hell.