Tsahraf ChahsidMimetes wrote:
But my family and I have discovered simple, distinguishable sounds that are not in the IPA, for instance, consonants made through the nose.
I think this is because the IPA is only supposed to include sounds that are distinguished in human languages. There are plenty of other sounds that humans can make, but as far as we know they're not actually used contrastively in any natural language. So people using the IPA for speech pathology, for instance, use some extensions to it for transcribing disordered speech:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensions_to_the_International_Phonetic_AlphabetTsahraf ChahsidMimetes wrote:
Also, not all of the IPA characters, even the most commonly used ones, are typable with my keyboard.
I am planning on making a phonetic system of my own that uses only keyboard characters, and has a more useful selection of sounds.
You may want to look into X-SAMPA (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-SAMPA) for this - it's a system of writing IPA just using ASCII characters. It looks really ugly, but it works!
