Lady E.,
Its amazing how many things you have to learn to write fantasy.

There is no real set boundary that I have found for army size, though I think they are generally in the middle to high ten thousands, and the very low hundred thousands at times. It depends a lot on context, like, how large the nations fighting are, how easily the land can support a host of fighting men, how important the war is to the different sides, and whether either nation has conquered dominions that can be levied for soldiers.
When the Britons opposed Suetonius's Roman army, the Britons mustered at an estimated 230,000.
When Austria, France, and Russia allied themselves to crush and divide Prussia their joint forces amounted to quite a bit over 400,000.
This certainly doesn't mean that the Britons had less reason to fight than the allies against Prussia, - every British man able to fight rose up against Suetonius - but that Briton was smaller.
So, basically, it depends on context.
How quickly the armies travel realistically has pretty much the same answer. A pack of Arabian camelriders sweeping round through an empty desert in the wet season to a surprise attack
will travel a good bit faster than a legion of Romans slogging to winter quarters through a swamp. Add a baggage train and they might not get there till spring.

There are, of course, the more apparent things to be taken into account for context, like, whether it is the dry season or the wet season, in the more tropical climates; whether the host is mainly composed of cavalry or infantry; whether they are trying to go fast or slow; whether they have baggage to slow them down, and things of that sort. But another thing is the commander.
Daun, one of the generals in the seven years war, was a very slow general, and consequently his army was slow. Frederick, his opponent, on the other hand, would manage to get his Prussians from one place to another with astonishing rapidity. A commander counts for a lot.
So thats some stuff I've found, hope it helps.

I was trying to do some research for the numbers in our G. A. Hentys and ended up reading at least four of them almost all the way through. I always get stuck when I try to do research in books, they
suck me in. Catch a few paragraphs out of some of my favorite battles, and then it just, kind of, ends up with me reading the whole thing. Research is fun.

About Faulkner. Well, I really like your idea, and, being an ISTP myself, I asked Mama what could change about my personality to make me feel off. She said that it would probably be talking more in a group of people and displaying my feelings more readily.

(Note: remember, more ready to show emotion is more than just irritability.)
Another idea Mama and I came up with is to take the queen's personality type, line it up with his, and then adjust the balance of the letters where they do not correspond slightly towards her.
I hope this helps you!
And Mama says I'm concise.

