KathrineROID wrote:
Jonathan Garner wrote:
Forewords and afterwords seem to be most useful when one is used by itself, rather than a novel having both. They also seem to be most useful when the author writes them, rather than the often dull afterwords and forewords that are written by "distinguished" people for classics.
Agree 100%.
I also realize I failed to talk about afterwords.  Or epilogues. 

I'm not a big fan of these.  For me, I like the story and everything else to end at The End.  It feels so much more powerful.  If there is more story to tell, let it be implied, don't state it in an epilogue.
Same. I often find Forewords boring, and Afterwords intriguing. However, I think there is a distinct differences between foreward/afterword and prologue/epilogue. F/A are usually not a part of the book, but either historical insightful passages about the novel you are about to/have read, author comments, acknowledgements, or "distinguished" people's analysis of the book.
P/E are usually a part of the story itself, stating something that happened before the appointed novel time, or after the supposed end of the story. These are a must read, if you want to know what exactly happened in the story. 

If I've got anything wrong here, feel free to correct me. 
